Yesterday, the Virginia Supreme Court heard oral arguments pertaining to cases previously brought prior to the April 21st referendum election throughout the commonwealth. Initially, the justices had lifted the temporary restraining order issued by Tazewell County judge Jack Hurley, Jr., without considering the merits of the case. The Gateway Pundit reported on the issues that were facing the Va. Supreme Court ahead of the referendum vote. However, the justices determined that they could only rule on the merits of the case if the election succeeded in passing the amendment, allowing the redrawing of districts to favor a new map giving Democrats a 10-to-1 congressional majority in an essentially evenly divided state. The previous map was 6 to 5 in favor of Democrats. Virginia requires an…
Click here to read the full article at The Gateway Pundit.
